A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between possible neighbours around the construction of the wall in a coastal web site within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which has captivated nationwide focus next an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of planning breaches, environmental worries, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times short article about René Collier as well as Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has evolved right into a very publicised authorized struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development is effective at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a business director respectively, seek to build their relatives property. The situation is now emblematic of wider disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, in which enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. In accordance with the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining made by their possible neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both residents of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their organizing authorization by developing a wall further than the boundaries of their website, resulting in an encroachment on a Exclusive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result areas are matter to demanding controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, especially in a very delicate coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially crafted, is in the right placement. Their lawful group has characterised the motion being an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful development. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding as a way to maintain their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal organizing disputes, where by views of the sea are both of those very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn proof referenced from the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-superior drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic from the depth on the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they were being intended to Collect Visible evidence of your wall’s place relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the water in the course of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the location grew to become Among the most putting descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely noted that this kind of steps were cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief the wall extended into an area influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been included intimately from the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 grew to become greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to further more submissions on no matter if interim orders needs to be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important second in the legal timeline.
In the core of the dispute is a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as manufactured, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and problems attached into the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by worry for environmental protection and adherence to setting up law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting instead that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have described their extensive-standing connection to the world as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple basically attempting to build a household household in accordance Together with the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Unique Place of Conservation and say that each one works are actually carried out dependant on Expert advice and authorised designs. Their legal professionals have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean all through a storm, usually do not change the underlying facts.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above building of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for the condition that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation between personal land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is starting to become additional contentious.
The Irish Instances report about René Collier famous which the businessman had previously been associated with local advocacy on planning and environmental difficulties, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from really distinct Expert backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have become synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waistline-higher h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances and René Collier waded via waist-large h2o during a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting each the physical reality with the coastline and also the symbolic nature on the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated determination; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an too Rene Collier and Paul Feely much tactic.
Because the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result continues to be uncertain. The court should decide whether the wall as designed complies with organizing authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Location of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and preparing conditions. But the human component stays central: neighbours who ought to Stay along with each other lengthy following the lawful prices are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction will work at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for instance environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it will eventually be altered, taken off, or done as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.